Connect with us
https://paxful.com/?utm_source=CGNT&utm_medium=Banner&utm_term=Crypto%20Global%20News%20Team

Blockchain News

Central Bank Digital Currencies Are Good for Bitcoin So Says Barry Silbert

Published

on

Central Bank Digital Currencies Are Good for Bitcoin, Barry Silbert Says
Central Bank Digital Currencies Are Good for Bitcoin So Says Barry Silbert

Bitcoin (BTC) would benefit from global central banks issuing their own cryptocurrencies, the founder at the world’s largest digital asset manager believes. Barry Silbert, founder and CEO of digital currency asset manager Grayscale Investments and blockchain venture capital firm Digital Currency Group (DCG), has again expressed his bullish stance on Bitcoin in the latest Grayscale investor call on Feb. 12. During the call titled “The State of Digital Currencies,” Silbert spoke of a number of important digital asset-related issues including Bitcoin’s role in the generational shift in wealth, stablecoins, decentralized finance and central bank digital currencies (CBDC).

CBDCs are virtual currencies that are issued and controlled by a federal regulator. In contrast to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, CBDCs apparently represent fiat money in the digital form. While no global jurisdiction has launched a CBDC to date, a number of governments have been increasingly exploring and building such projects, with China reportedly preparing to issue the first real-world test of its CBDC soon. According to a new survey by the Bank of International Settlements, at least 10% of central banks are likely to issue a CBDC for the general public in the short term.

Image result for central banks

Silbert, who claims to have bought his first Bitcoin back in 2012, or about three years after the creation of the very first block on the Bitcoin blockchain, argued that central banks that develop their own fiat currency-pegged digital currencies might be providing more power to Bitcoin by paving the way for institutional interest. According to the Grayscale CEO, Bitcoin and other non-central bank cryptocurrencies could eventually benefit from the same infrastructure that is used by the widespread adoption of CBDC:

“So at one point of the future we might have 80 different CBDCs. And if that happens, it would trigger a tremendous amount of investment in operators of financial systems where essentially every financial institution would then have to be able to safely store and transact CBDCs and, guess what, if they actually build that infrastructure, that same infrastructure could be used for non-central bank digital currencies like Bitcoin.”

Additionally, Silbert expressed confidence that central banks will likely eventually require users to use and engage with the existing financial systems and will not be capping the supply of the digital currency. “Central banks love to print money,” Silbert noted in order to point out Bitcoin’s limited supply feature. Predicting that CBDCs are “not a 2020 thing” but would rather be adopted in many years or decades, Silbert outlined that CBDCs are important because they contribute to the future value proposition of digital money. Founded in 2013, Grayscale Investments is recognized as the world’s largest digital currency asset manager by major crypto exchange and wallet service Coinbase. In January 2020, Grayscale reported that 2019 had become a record-breaking year for the company in terms of accumulated investment. The firm’s total investment surpassed the $1 billion threshold in 2019, while assets under management (AUM) surpassed $2 billion. According to the latest investor call, Grayscale has $3.1 billion AUM to date. The news comes amid Bitcoin breaking $10,000 threshold for the second time in 2020 to trade at over $10,200 at press time.

Blockchain News

Caitlin Long Chimes In On Her Lack Of Trust In Trust Companies

Published

on

Caitlin Long Chimes In On Her Lack Of Trust In Trust Companies
Caitlin Long Chimes In On Her Lack Of Trust In Trust Companies

Caitlin Long announced yesterday that she is launching Avanti Bank, and seeking a charter for it to become the first bank in the U.S. to offer crypto custody services. In a recent interview, she elaborated on why trust companies as crypto custodians are insufficient for institutional investors. 

Long explains “There’s a reason why the big custodians for institutional investors in securities markets are banks – two reasons, actually – 1) unlike trust companies, banks have direct access to the Fed for liquidity purposes, and 2) the treatment of a bank in bankruptcy is clear, while the treatment of a trust company in bankruptcy is unclear.” In addition to providing its clients with greater certainty in case of bankruptcy, “banks face MUCH higher capital requirements than trusts”, noted Long. Higher capital requirements also lower the risk of default. She notes that “pensions/endowmts/foundtns/corps/sov wealth” need this level of financial security before entering the crypto space. Long concludes:

“There’s not a bank in the US that can custody crypto right now – so this means trust company custodians are the only alternative at present. But trust companies can’t offer the risk reduction benefits of direct access to the Fed.”

There is no lack of players in the digital custody space, from corporate giants like Fidelity to crypto-native companies such as itBit, Coinbase, Gemini, and Xapo. There is even a bank that offers digital custody — Bank Frick, based in Liechtenstein.

For big institutional players to allocate some of the trillions of dollars they have under management to cryptocurrency, they need to have custodians that they — and their investors — can trust. To instill this trust, a crypto custodian must demonstrate technical expertise, legal clarity, and financial soundness. Long refers to the missing piece as “a regulated bank that can act as a bridge to Fed for payments + custody crypto for BIG institutional money”. If Avanti Bank fills this void, it may lead to the next phase of exponential growth for crypto, and some of the outlandish bitcoin price predictions may come true.

Continue Reading

Blockchain News

Big Pharma Pushing FDA to Use Blockchain for Drug Tracking

Published

on

Big Pharma Pushing FDA to Use Blockchain for Drug Tracking
Big Pharma Pushing FDA to Use Blockchain for Drug Tracking

25 leading pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, logistic partners, and other representatives of the pharma supply chain have published a report arguing in favor of adopting blockchain technology to track and trace prescription drugs after completing a pilot program with the US Food and Drug Administration. During early 2019, the FDA began accepting proposals for projects seeking to assist the office meet the 2023 requirements of the Drug Supply Chain and Security Act (DSCSA) – which requires the pharmaceutical industry to track “legal changes in ownership of pharmaceuticals in the supply chain.”

In June 2019, the MediLedger Project was approved by the FDA, comprising a working group of 25 major companies operating within the pharmaceutical supply chain seeking to evaluate the blockchain-based MediLedger Network as a vehicle for tracking and tracing prescription medicines in the US. MediLedger’s members include multinational pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, drug wholesaler AmerisourceBergen, operator of the United States’ second-largest pharmacy chain Walgreens, multinational retail corporation Walmart, and delivery services company FedEx.

The report states the working group believes that the absence of “a central point of data sharing” will result in the US pharmaceutical supply falling behind international competitors as companies “struggle with keeping data accurately and completely shared across a wide variety of partners, systems and technical formats. The document warns that in the event of a significant public health crisis, “stakeholders and agents will struggle to locate and quarantine suspect product in a timely manner, continuing to put patients’ lives at stake,” adding that “using the advancements of technology like blockchain can avoid these significant risks.”

The MediLedger report notes that data privacy requirements of the pharmaceutical industry can be upheld by maintaining zero knowledge proof technology, ensuring that no business intelligence of confidential information is shared while maintaining the immutability of the blockchain. Despite asserting that the pilot evidenced that “blockchain has the capability to be the technology underlying an interoperable system for the pharmaceutical supply chain,” the report notes that it is “a complex solution” that would require a stabilization period. The report also advances that the long-term success of an interoperable blockchain solution will be contingent on “strong participation and adoption from all industry stakeholders.”

Image result for FDA

The MediLedger project comprised three core technologies: a private messaging system between clients by and trading partners, blockchain as an immutable, shared ledger for transaction validification and smart contract execution, and zero-knowledge to ensure robust privacy for messaging and transfers. David Vershure, the vice president of channel and contract management at Genentech, asserts that the US pharmaceutical sector’s current point-to-point systems infrastructure is “lack[ing] the ability to keep data in-sync across the healthcare supply chain, which ultimately increases the risk of counterfeit, diverted or otherwise illegitimate products.”

The Genentech representative stated that the pilot “serves as a key milestone in demonstrating that blockchain technology is a viable option to address the complexity of building an interoperable system needed for DSCSA 2023.” Mack MacKenzie, Pfizer’s vice president of digital market access and revenue management solutions, expressed his satisfaction with the pilot’s execution, stating: “I am very encouraged by this demonstration of broad industry commitment to an interoperable system that achieves DSCSA compliance. It is exciting to imagine how we can build on this success to jointly deliver transformative digital services that add more value for patients.”

Continue Reading

Blockchain News

Bitmain’s Antminer E3 May Soon Stop Ethereum Mining

Published

on

Bitmain’s Antminer E3 May Soon Stop Ethereum Mining
Bitmain’s Antminer E3 May Soon Stop Ethereum Mining

While the Ethereum network is preparing to start shifting to proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus, some mining devices might soon stop supporting ETH mining at all. Bitmain’s Antminer E3, once the “world’s most powerful” hardware for mining Ether (ETH), will allegedly stop Ethereum mining in April 2020, according to a Feb. 24 report by altcoin mining pool 2Miners.

2Miners revealed the news after its team requested Bitmain to comment on the recent issues with Antminer E3 performance involving Ethereum Classic (ETC) — an open-sourced blockchain platform that derived from Ethereum hard fork in 2016 after the DAO collapse. On Feb. 21, 2Miners started receiving first reports on significant deterioration on Antminer E3 mining rigs performance on ETC pool. According to 2Miners, some users reported a sixfold hashrate drop on Antminer E3 — from the factory-declared hashrate of 180 MH/s to as low as 30 MH/s.

Following an internal investigation, 2Miners managed to find out that all global ETC pools were reported the same drop in hashrate. At the same time, Antminer E3 was still performing fine on Ethereum pools, 2Miners said. The team immediately suggested that the issue was likely to be connected with directed acyclic graph (DAG) — a file that is generated every new group of 30,000 blocks known as a mining epoch. When mining Ethereum, each GPU requires a big file called DAG at the start of the mining process, 2Miners elaborated.

Image result for ethereum

As DAG files grow each 30,000 blocks, or mining epoch, the memory capacity has apparently reached its limit. Following a request to Bitmain helpdesk, 2Miners was reportedly able to confirm that the growth of DAG files limited the usage of Antminer E3 for mining ETC. According to Bitmain, Antminer E3, which is an ASIC miner, still contains a 4GB video card for mining, while the DAG file is approaching the threshold. Bitmain reportedly said:

“[…] Antminer E3 is a 4GB video card. E3 is related to ETH algorithm, and DDR capacity is up to the upper limit, so E3 will not be able to continue mining. The meaning is E3 only can mine until January 2020, then will not mine again.”

According to 2Miners’ calculations, Antminer E3 should terminate Ethereum mining roughly on April 8, 2020. According to the mining pool, the current Ethereum Classic mining epoch is 328 while it is still 318 for Ethereum. According to the DAG size calculator data, the DAG size for Ethereum accounts for 3.48 GB, while the one for Ethereum Classic amounts to 3.56 GB at press time. Released by Chinese mining giant Bitmain in April 2018, Antminer E3 was touted as the “world’s most powerful and efficient EtHash ASIC miner.” As reported previously, Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) hashing algorithm used by Ethereum and a variety of other altcoins such as ETC.

The release of Antminer E3 came amid the Ethereum community suggesting the possibility of a hard fork in the ETH protocol to invalidate ETH ASICs. As the Ethereum blockchain is expected to shift from its current PoW consensus algorithm to PoS soon, the block validation function is poised to be given from miners to special network validators. In a recent interview, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said that the first phase of Ethereum 2.0 will be released later in 2020.

Continue Reading

TRENDING

Copyright © 2015 Crypto Global News Team.